Judicial Appointment Reform

Judges should be above partisan politics.

sponsored by Concerned Citizens Coalition • Become a Co-sponsor

primary topic: Amendments
secondary topics: Government


Judicial holds have been a problem for years, especially as elections near, and the party that does not hold the executive obstructs and delays appointments in hopes of winning the white house, and appointing different nominees.

My proposal is to remove the incentive to hold up the confirmation process in this way by changing our constitution so that appointments for judgeships on federal courts must be acted on even if there is a change of administration, and end filibusters for judicial confirmation hearings.

Judges are supposed to be above partisan politics. Let's treat them that way.


Submit an Op-ed



Op-ed Guidelines
Please bring up points that were missed, elaborate on issues not fleshed out, add ways to make the idea/bill better, suggest a companion for GREATER Raters to consider. Please check your facts, grammar, syntax, punctuation, credit sources and quotes, and keep it under 500 words unless you absolutely cannot—then never more than 700 words. Please keep your criticism constructive. We will likely not print destructive criticism although a well written partisan rant bringing up new issues in the idea/bill or previous Op-eds may be accepted if it ends on a constructive note—especially if it offers an alternative idea/bill.

Shorter "letters" are encouraged that bring a new facet to the subject. The intent of the Op-eds is to fully cover the issue for the kind reader to consider before rating, and not waste their time with redundancy or the dreaded—"people-screaming-at-one-another-while-wearing-earplugs-syndrome." Think of the idea/bill as the base with the Op-eds stacked on top to form a structurally sound argument. The goal here is to have a GREATER US for the greatest number of citizens/neighbors. We may publish your piece without notice—so please only submit completed articles. We may, also, contact you for a rewrite or edit. We might even offer suggestions. It is our intention to fairly present the views of fiscal conservatives, independents, and social liberals—to find the overlap of whole-hearted support (nonpartisan) plus the commonality of the "I-can-live-with-that" (bipartisan).

Your Ad Here