Blind Trusts for Blind Justice (SCOTUS)

Will Remove Corrupting Influences

sponsored by aGREATER.US • Become a Co-sponsor

primary topic: Supreme Court
secondary topics:


A lifetime job with a guaranteed income: good work if you can get it. The nine Supreme Court Justices have that now, and they are allowed to own stock in corporations/industries they will be ruling on. Supreme Court Justices should be made to put their wealth into blind trusts so they do not know whether a ruling will be to their financial betterment or detriment. If future nominees do not like the terms of employment, they can decline their nominations.

Oh, and Supreme Court Justices should not accept money from corporations they regulate.

Lady Justice doesn't hide an iPhone with one-eye on her investments, she's blindfolded holding up a scale.


Submit an Op-ed



Op-ed Guidelines
Please bring up points that were missed, elaborate on issues not fleshed out, add ways to make the idea/bill better, suggest a companion for GREATER Raters to consider. Please check your facts, grammar, syntax, punctuation, credit sources and quotes, and keep it under 500 words unless you absolutely cannot—then never more than 700 words. Please keep your criticism constructive. We will likely not print destructive criticism although a well written partisan rant bringing up new issues in the idea/bill or previous Op-eds may be accepted if it ends on a constructive note—especially if it offers an alternative idea/bill.

Shorter "letters" are encouraged that bring a new facet to the subject. The intent of the Op-eds is to fully cover the issue for the kind reader to consider before rating, and not waste their time with redundancy or the dreaded—"people-screaming-at-one-another-while-wearing-earplugs-syndrome." Think of the idea/bill as the base with the Op-eds stacked on top to form a structurally sound argument. The goal here is to have a GREATER US for the greatest number of citizens/neighbors. We may publish your piece without notice—so please only submit completed articles. We may, also, contact you for a rewrite or edit. We might even offer suggestions. It is our intention to fairly present the views of fiscal conservatives, independents, and social liberals—to find the overlap of whole-hearted support (nonpartisan) plus the commonality of the "I-can-live-with-that" (bipartisan).

Your Ad Here