Was it a conspiracy to make us a more jumpy society, or what?
You go to the store, minding your own business, and a horn blasts, WARNING, you are about die, yet another victim of vehicular manslaughter. Noooo, it's just some jackass who is too lazy to confirm his or her car is locked by looking at the blessedly silent blinking fog or brake lights. Probably because they had their eyes on their smartphone. I'm multi-tasking here! Or too busy to read the owner's manual and select the horn-off feature.
Maybe it's just a conspiracy to get us to think about cars three times every minute of every day. I wonder what I should make for dinner, we had "Honk" last night. Wow, nice ride. I should test drive that baby next year. We haven't had "chirp" in a while. Ooh, a convertible. I'd look good getting a tan while driving. The kids didn't really like that "yikes!" last week. OMG, I dropped my cell phone. Ok, which car did that? C'mon fess up. Own it.
Are you with me on this? SILENCE CAR DOOR LOCKING HORNS. We're a reasonable society, chirps can be tolerated. But, we need to live free and not die of fright from gratuitous honking. Exercise your citizen's rights. Fight for no fright. Rate this five stars!
Please bring up points that were missed, elaborate on issues not fleshed out, add ways to make the idea/bill better, suggest a companion for GREATER Raters to consider. Please check your facts, grammar, syntax, punctuation, credit sources and quotes, and keep it under 500 words unless you absolutely cannot—then never more than 700 words. Please keep your criticism constructive. We will likely not print destructive criticism although a well written partisan rant bringing up new issues in the idea/bill or previous Op-eds may be accepted if it ends on a constructive note—especially if it offers an alternative idea/bill.
Shorter "letters" are encouraged that bring a new facet to the subject. The intent of the Op-eds is to fully cover the issue for the kind reader to consider before rating, and not waste their time with redundancy or the dreaded—"people-screaming-at-one-another-while-wearing-earplugs-syndrome." Think of the idea/bill as the base with the Op-eds stacked on top to form a structurally sound argument. The goal here is to have a GREATER US for the greatest number of citizens/neighbors. We may publish your piece without notice—so please only submit completed articles. We may, also, contact you for a rewrite or edit. We might even offer suggestions. It is our intention to fairly present the views of fiscal conservatives, independents, and social liberals—to find the overlap of whole-hearted support (nonpartisan) plus the commonality of the "I-can-live-with-that" (bipartisan).